Nolan & Heller

joerevvv 

on Yellow Pages

16 years ago

Please read first 4 reviews, in backwards order; in order for this one to make sense So I went to see Goldin, unscheduled, to ask him why he lied to the Committee on Professional Standards. I was not angry, just really curious. As explained in other posts, there was really no reason for Goldin to lie, he could have defended himself without the lies. I got to his office, he allowed me in his office, we sat down. I was very nervous, and asked very meekly; why he felt the need to lie to the Committee on Professional Standards, ... read more

joereview 

on Yellow Pages

16 years ago

(continution) Here's a narrative of my experiences with Goldin : - There was just 1 meeting with the 4 of us (my ex and I and our lawyers). I pushed and pushed to try to get more, but they never happened. Goldin claimed that her lawyer, Tom Snyder, refused any other 4 way meetings. Obviously this left me feeling disenfranchised - There were just a handful of conversations between Goldin and Snyder. Every week I hounded Goldin, asked what was going on, gave him things to mail to Snyder or to read word for word over the phone ... read more

joereviewer 

on Yellow Pages

16 years ago

(Split into several parts due to the 4000 char limit) Goldin was my lawyer for my legal seperation case. I had to file charges against him with the Committee on Professional Standards (which is a committee of 18 lawyers and 3 non-lawyers that look into charges filed against lawyers), due to my signing the legal seperation agreement based on what he told me it meant; when it turned out numerous other lawyers I showed the agreement to afterwards had a different interpretation of it than Goldin did In his written statements to ... read more

joerev 

on Yellow Pages

16 years ago

(continuation) - A few years later, I started interviewing lawyers for someone to represent me at the 5 year review, I talked to around 12 in all. I showed all the lawyers the legal seperation agreement. None of them were as optimistic as Goldin that the wording of the alimoney clause would not hurt me at the 5 year review, some thought it would be interpreted to mean alimoney should continue indefinitely if conditions had not changed - Therefore I filed a complaint with the Committee on Professional Standards. This process ... read more

joerrrr 

on Yellow Pages

16 years ago

(continuation -- In case you're wondering, he got away with his lies. The Committee on Professional Standards doesn't actually investigate (they didnot talk to other people involved in the case, or use any common sense based on legal precedent or human nature to figure things out), instead they just take statements from each side and then say well nothing is proven. --- They also said they investigate misconduct, not malpractice, and they said my basic charge that what Goldin told me the legal seperation agreement was not ac... read more